As of June 17, 2013, 584 votes have been cast on our first annual poll of Emerging Ethical Dilemmas and Policy Issues in Science and Technology! Human enhancements currently has almost 10% of the total votes.
It's not too late to vote!
Pharmaceutical, surgical, mechanical, and neurological technologies are already available for therapeutic purposes (think of antidepressants and corrective surgeries designed to correct disabilities of some sort). But these same enhancements can be used to magnify human biological function beyond the societal norm. Adderall, for example, is designed to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, but can also be used to enhance the alertness and cognition of those without the disorder. Using performance-enhancing drugs such as stimulants, blood-boosters, and synthetic growth hormone is generally considered unethical by bodies that govern academics and athletics because they either pose some physical risk or create an unlevel playing field. But is enhancement really unethical? And how to do distinguish between ethical and unethical uses of this technology?
- Is human enhancement "cheating"?
- Does a person have a right to alter their own body in order to achieve greater things?
- Do companies or employees have a responsibility to encourage or participate in human enhancement so that they can be more productive (or decrease the number of accidents on the job)? If so, who pays for this?
- Do two equally capable students get the same grade if one is taking Adderall to enhance their attention, memory, and cognition? Should we require learners to disclose any medications they're taking?
- Exoskeletons and bionic limbs are developed in order to help disabled people regain function; do we withhold the technology from others who may want to use it in order to walk or run faster or do more physical work?
- Should we allow people to choose whether or not they would like to take the risk of developing long-term side effects so that they can live an "enhanced" life in their productive years? If so, how is their work valued? What happens to the part of work force that is not willing to enhance their bodies?
- Where do we draw the line between therapy and enhancement?
- Is it ethical to create "supersoldiers" with drugs, genetic engineering, and/or cyborg technologies to guarantee military success? How about to reduce injury to soldiers?
- Where does an "enhanced" person fit into society?
- How do we justify enhancing human bodies when so many individuals still lack access to basic therapeutic medicine?
- What are the implications of enhancements for human dignity?
To learn more, see Ethics of Human Enhancement: 25 Questions & Answers (a report prepared for the NSF by Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin, James Moor, and John Weckert).
For a comprehensive popular overview of the issues, see Slate.com's Superman series.
Ethical dilemmas of human enhancement:
- AAAS Scientific Responsibility, Human Rights and Law Program, Reports on Human Enhancement
- Human Enhancement and the Future of Work Report
- Why Bioenhancement of Mathematical Ability is Ethically Important
- Ethics in Public Policy Making: The Case of Human Enhancement
- Directorate General for Internal Policies: Science and Technology Options Assessment on Human Enhancement
- Is Human Enhancement Cheating? (Slate.com)
- History of Human Enhancement: How plastic surgery, birth control, asprin, IVF, and LASIK make us superhuman
- Enhanced Warfighters: Risk, Ethics, and Policy (Cal Poly Ethics & Emerging Sciences Group)
- Human Enhancement Ethics: The State of the Debate (chapter from Human Enhancements, Oxford University Press, 2008)
- Human Enhancement for the Common Good—Using Neurotechnologies to Improve Eyewitness Memory (bioethics.net)
- The Future of Robotics: In a Transhuman World, The Disabled Will Be The Ones Without Prosthetic Limbs (The Guardian)
- Ethics: The Questions Posed By Our Bionic Bodies (The Guardian)
Enhancement in war:
- The Link Between War and Bioengineered Humans
- Could Human Enhancement Turn Soldiers Into Weapons That Violate International Law? Yes (The Atlantic)
- DARPA's Warrior Web project
- It Could Be A War Crime To Use Biologically Enhanced Soldiers
- More Than Human? The Ethics of Biologically Enhancing Soldiers (The Atlantic)
- Military Must Prep Now for ‘Mutant’ Future, Researchers Warn (Wired)
Enhancement in cognition:
- Smart Policy: Cognitive Enhancement and the Public Interest (In Enhancing Human Capacities, Wiley-Blackwell, 2009)
- Humans With Amplified Intelligence Could Be More Powerful Than AI (i09)
- The Risky Rise of the Good-Grade Pill (NYT)
- Towards Responsible Use of Cognitive-Enhancing Drugs By the Healthy (Op-ed in Nature)